We’re always told to reach as high as we can, to strive for the tippity top. A life has its ups and downs, we are also told. Chin up, nose to the grindstone, get back on that horse that threw you to the curb. These things, in incarnations, we also often here. Or I have. We hear about spiraling and we hear about rock bottom as well. But one thing I have heard much less about, at least in any detail, is what falling really feels like, what a rush it is, how dizzying, we lose our composure, but yet there’s the thrills, the excitement, the outright fear. Reaching a peak. Missing a stop at the very top. Falling off the bluff. Oops. That’s no fun. Unless maybe you have a hang glider, or (if it happens to be an extra long fall) a parachute. A minute ago I was reaching for a goal, wishing to reach that peak barely discernible on the horizon. Now I am in freefall with no way to float through it, no parachute to make the landing livable. Hey, all you cheerleaders! What should I do? Is there an upside to freefalling? And what, I ask, if but one more inquiry, was so special about the peak I made it to, the one from which I just now fall?
It was a beautiful day. I was strolling through one of St. Petersburg’s most prominent parks. Yes, it was a tourist
attraction. I was a tourist. On a two-night stop on a Baltic Sea gay cruise, if you can imagine that. I like to
imagine it. Even though I’m pretty sure I was there. I have photos. And the port’s architectural skyline burned
into my brain. So it must be true? Anyway, if it was, as we were strolling through this tourist area in St. Petersburg,
suddenly there was a bit of a louder set of vocal noises coming from the sidewalk that our tour guide has us strolling down,
toward some magnificent desti nation, I’m sure. I turned around to see if I could determine what the hubbub might be and all I
noticed at first was that there was a group of people of various ages and heights, women and men, it seemed, dressed perhaps a bit
differently than the rest of us, and they were hauling ass down the side walk in, around, amongst us naive
foreigners. It all happened quite
fast, the group sped through and were gone. It was only shortly thereafter that there were murmur ings of pickpockets – my gay cruise
tour through the middle of St. Peters burg had been targeted by a professional gang of pickpocketers. The stories of what had been taken started circulating
around – they had done quite a bit of damage to our little group. They got nothing from me, though. I had been, as is my habit, walking with my hands
in my pants pockets with my left hand wrapped around my wallet, which I had for many years been placing in my front pocket, for fear of it being pickpocketed.
I wouldn’t have had that much in it. Much more, I suppose than I’ve carried around in a very long time, I’m sure, but for a foreigner in Russia on a guided tour, not
a lot, relatively speaking, I’m sure. For a long while, back when I had friends, one by one they each began getting mugged in my city, here in San Francisco.
That was a rite of passage I wanted nothing to do with. I’ve no second thoughts about wandering the city, even some of its most traditionally shady areas, in the middle of
the night or very early in the morning before the sun rises. It’s not a city that is up all night, the kind I thought would have been for me, but there is something
calm and comforting to me about walking at night through a quiet, sparse metropolis. But I generally stay on the street when I walk, and move swiftly, always aware of
what’s going on around me. So, I suppose fear has been a huge motivator for me. In general. And probably is for many of us. But in this age of bullying and fearmongering,
dispensed for power and money, I find myself growing complacent. Perhaps this is a personal protest to what has changed most significantly, to my eyes, on this planet we inhabit. The
pickpocketing gang was more of an amusement to me at the time than anything else. But the pop of a firecracker or the initial rumblings of an earthquake are enough to make me jump
and run around in a frenzy in search of whatever I impulse has me think of as safety. Or safer. I don’t want to die a tragic death. This seems like a universal desire. But maybe I’m headed there.
Sixteen years ago I was on a gay cruise on the Baltic. I visited Russia. I haven’t been outside of the San Francisco Bay Area but once in the past fifteen years. I know I’d take the onrush of that
gang of thieves over complacency, over another ten years of complacency, or just to have another ten years, just to know, just to force myself back out into a perhaps more dangerous world, just for
a few more international adventures, maybe walk the entire night through the streets of a city that is abuzz at all hours of the day and night. How to build such actions back into the realm of the possibility,
that’s the question I’m realizing, with a lot of sadness, that I have at the moment. Forcing a soliloquy on the distinct possibility of a lack of hope for such an outcome is worth a try, I suppose. I hope. Sure, why not?
Happy Pop Dance Music with Big Bouncy Enlivened Beats Is Back Week
You should hear what I’ve just heard. I’m here so you don’t have to be, though. Thank me now, because guess what? For a few years now, a little known old-school
saying became all the rage. Yes, I’m talking about Get thee to a nunnery! Now that I’m thinking about it that sounds so right it has to be a misquote. T he problem with conver
sations about William S. Burroughs is that they, when occurring somewhere in vicinity, stop you so hard that you immediately forget every thing yur your own giddy conversation gang has
heraled. Thusly the score for the latest in a rather hot spate of dance parties you’ve hosted begins.
On a video call with Ginger last nigh she gave me a tour of her shop. It was a few Christmas lights, dimly lit in red, white
and blue. I had called to speak with Mom, who had once again had a couple of nights recently spent in the hospital for
some reason (this happens, the reasons have been numerous). Mom was there at Ginger’s house a few miles from rural Charleston, in
Arkansas, where we all resided from when we each were born until we left the home of our parents. Mom was there at Ginger’s place, too.
She was who I initially attempted to call, eating her supper, which consisted of some combination of chicken and potatoes, followed
by dessert, which Ginger kept stressing was a bit of a mistake in that whoever had made it, or however it had gotten made,
it had gotten made rather than with cherries, which I suppose were in the recipe, and for some reason it would have “made more sense”
with the cherries, this dessert, but the red fruity splotches that were in the heart of this odd-looking cake-like dish were not cherries,
as it is noted that they should have been, as if it it should have been obvious (wink wink) that it should have been a dessert the red chunks
of cherries, but some wiseguy like character, seemingly, had instead put in strawberries.
Somone mischeivous and wrong but yet slightly
naughty in that good sort of way, this all from the different faces Ginger made as she kept repeating apects of the story of how it had
become so, had gotten the bright idea to put in strawberries (and some Cool Whip, and, for good measure, sprinkles of slightly browned coconut,
as well). Oh, and Ginger’s shop turned out to be much bigger than a few dimly lit red, white and blue patriotic lights slung somehow slightly into
the wood next to which Ginger lives. There was a huge warehouse filled with exotic-looking vacationing automobiles and RVs, wherein
there had also been some recent time put into adding a first facsimile of a second floor room. And there was a warehouse-sized
open space that had a concrete floor with a roof over it (no walls), a roof which I imagined as cover to a large open shed rather than a shop, within and
outside of which there were potted plants with nestling cats (one was named Betty and Betty was quite a tiny cat) and there were otherwise
fountain-schaped sculptures of live plants scattered about as if to mimic flowing fountains from which came splashes of leaves and blooms
from the various plants within the “sculpture”. These plants resided within the open-air shed and were not actual spouting waters cascading
from elaborate sculpted spouts or spewing from the lips of, say, metallic fish of various sizes, around some sort of fountain periphery. Those
qualities would have made it an actual fountain, and there yet may have been some of those somewhere around what Ginger called her shop, which were
actually a rather elaborate set of spaces, slanted and flat, walled in or open-spaced, wooded or more domecile in nature, all of which apparently made up Ginger’s shop.
I embraced a cloud, but when I soared it rained. —Frank O’Hara
I embraced a rainbow, and slid down its length getting rich from gold until I fell into the boiling cauldron at the end of that rainbow
So I came out pretty injured as a result of this particular hug, this unlucky get rich scheme. And I won’t but go down screaming awaiting
the catastrophe that is my personality to seem like Frank’s typical beautiful self again, but it suddenly blooming into something interesting, or even modern (like perhaps I once would seem from some angles), is really pushing it.
Come to the Club, come in to the Club of Love —Madonna, ”Love Without Words”
Or that’s how I heard it come out when I accidentally—or inadvertently—found my way catching the entire brand new album, the first one she has released in six or seven years, I believe, and a sequel to one of her most popular albums ever. So, before I even know it, I’ve listened to the whole of today’s newly released Confessions II. And like the lyrics of the 3rd, 4th and 5th best songs on either of her albums, I find myself at times laughing at her silly lyrics. But also, all the while, and especially with this album, I am one hundred percent on board, in this case caught up in each subtly complex, hippy ditty, even and esecially the silly, particularly Madonna-esque
turns of some of the dumbest-sounding lyrics. One after the other, all of the songs pop up on my YouTube, each song playing in its entirety, as I just listen, in awe of how the album is so smartly and tightly and thematically put together,
how poignant her lyrics are, how crisp and deceptively-layered each tune is. Several songs have sparkling resonance with individual songs from this album’s prequel, her Confessions on a Dancefloor. Much as I do love her and her music and how she’s steadily flown through the zeitgeist ever since I was a teen,
there are some very integral aspects of a dance-pop tune that she does not have
a lot of talent in order to maintain these standard qualities, some of the most importnt ones she seems incapable of even pulling off. And yet, her albums are most often brilliant successes. I am not here to explain this mystery, just point it out. As noted, it can be debated with ease that she cannot sing, that her lyrics are ridiculous, that it is not that easy for her to focus on a central theme for any album, simplicity rules over muli-faceted parts coming together with the delicate attention or coming together at all within any album or even song, and much of her notorious repetitions within songs and albums come across as redundant or trite for the sake of redundacy and cliche. So this album sounds literally too good to be a Madonna album, I keep thinking. But it is (too good and a Madonna album indeed!). Somewhere in here, there has to have been a joke upon which some clique is rolling their eyes at us in disgust at our ignorance. But it appears that this lovely collage of dancefloor pop is no joke. It’s a masterpiece, I think. A
masterpiece? From Madonna, who has given us so much, how could we possibly deserve a Madonna masterpiece. It is not something I ever thought might come, even though one could argue that several from her decades in the business have been. While she might have at times simultaneously been the butt end of a few jokes during her thus far amazingly illustrious career. Again, it has been six or maybe even seven years since she even put out an album. And no one is more representative of each dancefloor’s diary over the past nearly 50 years, of my lifetime. Her music has dominated, with iconic hit after hit filling the radio airwaves, television and internet music videos, awards ceremonies, cinemas and dancefloors the world over for as
far backas I can remember up to present day. All the while her controversies and causes could be found discussed in abundance from these and fro other more news-like talky venues. She’d ride the fence that lies between being loved and
hated masterfully, often having a hand in creating whatever was trending at any
particular moment, and doing something that would simultaneously thrill her fans while creating venom and spite among conservatives and other haters, popping up so often just to seemingly turn something upside down or inside out, instantaneously repopularizing her own self, paving the way for new
scrutiny on each hot potato subject along with a devotion to many personal
charity ventures for folks on the fringes, craving something risque or
humanitarian, etc., with many such moments changing how a general populace would forever view a subject matter. So today is that rare day in pop music history that will likely be once again such a turning point. And to make things even more riveting (at least to me) it seems that everyone in the industry came
out and did their best, as if simply in celebration of or to ride her coattails
during the debut of her new phase. Madonna. It has caught me so off-guard, which I love. Once again the granny of pop is holding on to the zeitgeist as if
it were the reigns to an elaborate stagecoach. And I am happy about it. Happy
for us. For where it takes us. And hopeful she will gain innumerable new fans in the process. I am indeed so happy for her. And I am very much
looking forward to inhabiting a dance floor again soon.
It is easy to be beautiful; it is difficult to appear so. I admire you, beloved, for the trap you’ve set. It’s like a final chapter no one reads because the plot is over. —Frank O’Hara (from “MEDITATIONS ON AN EMERGENCY”)
That is how I just typed it up, anyway. Or that’s the way it reads in my Donald
Allen edited O’Hara Selected. Which is, of course, saying something, but, these
days, is really saying something. And that’s not a good thing to say (as in No
way!). Is what I suppose I should really at this point relay.
And let also say that I am taking this stanza, this paragraph, completely as if it
were a (and couldn’t it easily be?) standalone.
But BEAUTY? Pah! I’m trying to envision it another way, but I can’t in his words imagine it but being his. Which would not only be so very different from mine
(and surely different from anyone else’s, I suppose, if one supposes such things),
but would also be some kind of IDEAL, his, if an attainable one. I imagine he
had a few candidates for such an ideal, idealist that he was, able to at any
seeming moment conjure up one of his muses.
I’m no scholar. I just have my big, awkward movements in that area. Which,
without picking up anything except, again, this particular Selected,
has me thinking O’Hara had in mind as representative of beautiful that
New York School muse that we would often him dipping his metaphorical
ink into,Jane Freilicher. Or it could be any number of such muses. But Jane,
The New York School muse.
But O'Hara was gay, I might point out (as I do, and surely others have made
a note of this as well. Or have they? This is how much I am NOT a scholar.
I’ve made it loud and clear so often over the years, that he’s my favorite poet
out of all of them, yes, the audacity, and I stand by it) – oh, if I could even be
a smidge as dishy and pithy and have even a tenth of whatever must have
generally floated around behind that tall young forehead.
So, beauty; back when it meant something. Perhaps towards the tail-end of
when it might have, just to add that, as if it were something that we knew.
But those three sentences. That singular paragraph (I love to imagine that
final word, over, as it stands by itself on its own line, as intentional
enjambment; form might have been something that was beginning to also
lose meaning, by this time, which I say as if it means something, but as far
as I can tell, scholar that I ain’t, it still was a veritable ruler, a stick that
might be, ahem, shoved up something, and surely often and (even today)
sometimes happily. Someplace. It seems so ... and would he not have
appreciated the word that just came to mind ... ineffectual?
But a philosophical bent seems clear to me, in that he wore his ideals upon
his sleeves, if you ask me, but why would you? AND he was gay, so any
concept of beauty he goes on to reduce in whatever way gets fractured
in so many of the ways and means of BEAUTY, at least to this small reader,
when it comes to how to interpret what the writer literally meant when HE
wrote the word.
But the simplicity of how those three sentences can, for me, indeed, conjured,
perhaps in pieces and parts deliberately Doctor Frank’ened (har har!) hap
hazardly together, building someone in particular I’ve never met, or just as
easily suggesting a particular half a dozen or more with whom I am at least
acquainted. How EASY that lovely paragraph can mean. And if that is what
happens when I read it, it would likely be just as magical to anyone else
who does. Try, it. You can, you know. Let me know if it works.
If so, just look how many of us are getting presently all bent out of shape,
getting giddy within our own recollections or collections. Our own selections
conjured from just a few lines in this particular selected poems, by my favorite
poet all time (I will keep being on the record just to say that much). A quote
that appears in one of my favorites poems by him, “MEDITATIONS ON AN
EMERGENCY.”
I mean, (Call 9-1-1!), who else but the man who not only put New York City
on the postmodern map, but turned it into an ideal—a place in which I’ve
never lived, have but taken up space within for no longer than a week or
two at a time. Such a beauty. (“Aw, shucks! Really?”)
But yet from a distance of all of the vast expanses from him and his words to
here, he can yet today have an unscholarly hick sitting in San Francisco
seeing BEAUTIFUL, seeing BEAUTY, as if truly knowing seeing it appear before
him in Cinemascope. Loud and clear. And that’s sincere.