new poem
There are always so many things to do.
No matter how many of them you’ve done!
—Glenn Ingersoll
I might as well make a
totally abstract to do list.
I realize what a tease I’d
be to not go ahead right
now and crank out just
for you an example of
what my abstract to do
list might look like,
but I’m actually quite
comfortable being called
a tease; it’s a notion that
has made me laugh for
several decades now –
I mean, it’s more than a
notion – since I’ve been
called a tease quite a few
times over the past several
decades. Me? A tease? I
have some pretty strong
beliefs, wrapped around
what I used to call a value
system that I was overjoyed
to see begin to solidify or
come to fruition, and the
old me, the one who might
at any given moment have
a quorum of some sort in my
very presence, would often
tout these beliefs based on this
burgeoning value system quite
vociferously. but just because
one believes strongly about
a particular subject does not
automatically mean that the
said believer is even an act
ive participant in that thing
which he might tout as being
good, a-ok, important, if no
thing else, food for lifelong
thought – for when a time a
rises wherein, say, this, what
had always been a very strong
and voluble belief might be app
ropriately put into play. I would
envision that this would become
less abstract (I’m curious, are you
at all surprised the direction these
lines are now taking, the twists and
turns that got us here – imagine for
a moment that there is no logic, no
logical progression; wouldn’t that
suck? Or would it? What if we had
no actual rules, and that all of our
belief systems—along with the values
those are potentially enwrapped and/or
tangled together with—what if all of
these were just based around hunches
rather than some sort of educated no
tions, what if there was no logic to
your or my belief system? Would
we even go to the trouble of putting
forth an effort at peaceful coexistence?)
If I start to give examples of what I am
talking about. So, here is one: I believe
strongly that monogamy is a ludicrous
construct. Just bringing this up would
always and almost immediately be the
start of quite a raucous discussion, the
purported sexuality of the quorum
notwithstanding – it’d always go
down the same: folks would be so
intrigued, mostly all vow that they
could not even imagine having an
open relationship, a non-monogam
ous one; the rules in which one might
get a bit of leeway would be discussed
(hypothetical celebrity free passes,
it’s okay to play around so long as it’s
at the gym, etc.,) and it might come up
how Europeans have infidelity down to
an art, which would allow that it is also
the expectation rather than the exception,
presumably. Now, all I said to start was
that monogamy was a ludicrous construct.
By the end of the discussion, feelings were
often visibly bruised, there were accusations
that I was trying to pawn off a belief system
to others, people would stand up for their val
ues, etc. I was the instigator. The one to be
careful around, because you might get pro
voked. I’d also often be, to the best of my
finite capacity for knowledge and my ability
to listen and comprehend and slice through all
of the bullshit, it would later appear to me,
the most ardent monogamist, the person who
would be the last to just up and disappear from
a relationship, a friendship, family, even. To
this day the hypocrisy of all that I would go
on to discover and rediscover over and over
again, the lack of logic applied to what folks
believed so strongly in, as far as I could
possibly glean.....I mean, this was a time
period in which I began to understand the imp
ortance of empathy, the same compact set of
years in which I’d, upon hearing about a friend
in need, would go out of my way to do anything
I could to make sure they were okay – it wasn’t
that this was a foreign concept with me, but for
reasons I could probably guess, I was a late
bloomer to ever feel those feelings, the need
to help others, rather than turning the other
way. I’m no martyr, please don’t imagine I am.
There are always so many things to do.
No matter how many of them you’ve done!
—Glenn Ingersoll
I might as well make a
totally abstract to do list.
I realize what a tease I’d
be to not go ahead right
now and crank out just
for you an example of
what my abstract to do
list might look like,
but I’m actually quite
comfortable being called
a tease; it’s a notion that
has made me laugh for
several decades now –
I mean, it’s more than a
notion – since I’ve been
called a tease quite a few
times over the past several
decades. Me? A tease? I
have some pretty strong
beliefs, wrapped around
what I used to call a value
system that I was overjoyed
to see begin to solidify or
come to fruition, and the
old me, the one who might
at any given moment have
a quorum of some sort in my
very presence, would often
tout these beliefs based on this
burgeoning value system quite
vociferously. but just because
one believes strongly about
a particular subject does not
automatically mean that the
said believer is even an act
ive participant in that thing
which he might tout as being
good, a-ok, important, if no
thing else, food for lifelong
thought – for when a time a
rises wherein, say, this, what
had always been a very strong
and voluble belief might be app
ropriately put into play. I would
envision that this would become
less abstract (I’m curious, are you
at all surprised the direction these
lines are now taking, the twists and
turns that got us here – imagine for
a moment that there is no logic, no
logical progression; wouldn’t that
suck? Or would it? What if we had
no actual rules, and that all of our
belief systems—along with the values
those are potentially enwrapped and/or
tangled together with—what if all of
these were just based around hunches
rather than some sort of educated no
tions, what if there was no logic to
your or my belief system? Would
we even go to the trouble of putting
forth an effort at peaceful coexistence?)
If I start to give examples of what I am
talking about. So, here is one: I believe
strongly that monogamy is a ludicrous
construct. Just bringing this up would
always and almost immediately be the
start of quite a raucous discussion, the
purported sexuality of the quorum
notwithstanding – it’d always go
down the same: folks would be so
intrigued, mostly all vow that they
could not even imagine having an
open relationship, a non-monogam
ous one; the rules in which one might
get a bit of leeway would be discussed
(hypothetical celebrity free passes,
it’s okay to play around so long as it’s
at the gym, etc.,) and it might come up
how Europeans have infidelity down to
an art, which would allow that it is also
the expectation rather than the exception,
presumably. Now, all I said to start was
that monogamy was a ludicrous construct.
By the end of the discussion, feelings were
often visibly bruised, there were accusations
that I was trying to pawn off a belief system
to others, people would stand up for their val
ues, etc. I was the instigator. The one to be
careful around, because you might get pro
voked. I’d also often be, to the best of my
finite capacity for knowledge and my ability
to listen and comprehend and slice through all
of the bullshit, it would later appear to me,
the most ardent monogamist, the person who
would be the last to just up and disappear from
a relationship, a friendship, family, even. To
this day the hypocrisy of all that I would go
on to discover and rediscover over and over
again, the lack of logic applied to what folks
believed so strongly in, as far as I could
possibly glean.....I mean, this was a time
period in which I began to understand the imp
ortance of empathy, the same compact set of
years in which I’d, upon hearing about a friend
in need, would go out of my way to do anything
I could to make sure they were okay – it wasn’t
that this was a foreign concept with me, but for
reasons I could probably guess, I was a late
bloomer to ever feel those feelings, the need
to help others, rather than turning the other
way. I’m no martyr, please don’t imagine I am.
I do love screwing around with certain cultural
mores, however with; especially ones set up
around acts of engagement and of sex. and any
around acts of engagement and of sex. and any
thing near the concepts of love, commitment;
commitment. And honesty. These are
not abstract notions. But if I were to place
myself, or these lines, in the realm of the
abstract alone; if I were to forego all meta
phor, just string a few words together as
if they were a grocery list, or things to do
at the office this week, or even a design an
abstractly illegible (illegibly abstract) bucket
list, would the heartache be avoided? Would
hard-earned values be lost? Unidentifiable? Per
haps it’s not so easy connecting even a flimsy
correlation between the thoughts I started with
a the top of this piece with anything that has
commitment. And honesty. These are
not abstract notions. But if I were to place
myself, or these lines, in the realm of the
abstract alone; if I were to forego all meta
phor, just string a few words together as
if they were a grocery list, or things to do
at the office this week, or even a design an
abstractly illegible (illegibly abstract) bucket
list, would the heartache be avoided? Would
hard-earned values be lost? Unidentifiable? Per
haps it’s not so easy connecting even a flimsy
correlation between the thoughts I started with
a the top of this piece with anything that has
come after. And while I like to have things
very cut and dry, very clear, not so organic–
very cut and dry, very clear, not so organic–
as an actor I appreciated the director who
told you exactly when to walk from one
spot to the next, exactly what to say, in what
dialect; this was not restrictive to me, it was
freeing, and I could still earn my talent, show
case some of it, be the actor with range,
told you exactly when to walk from one
spot to the next, exactly what to say, in what
dialect; this was not restrictive to me, it was
freeing, and I could still earn my talent, show
case some of it, be the actor with range,
thanks especially to the directions that made
all of that possible? I don’t know. And what
does it matter, any of what I’m saying to you
now, here, on this virtual page? Not a thing,
really. . . . We’re told to think outside
of the box. If things don’t fit comfortably,
if this narrative seems to meander, doesn’t
say much, or what is it doing exactly? And
why? Are these questions we need to answer?
Absolutely not. But it’s good to ask them
once in a while. It’s good to take on an
occasional challenge. And to return
that favor by challenging others,
don’t you think? Anyway, I would
now, here, on this virtual page? Not a thing,
really. . . . We’re told to think outside
of the box. If things don’t fit comfortably,
if this narrative seems to meander, doesn’t
say much, or what is it doing exactly? And
why? Are these questions we need to answer?
Absolutely not. But it’s good to ask them
once in a while. It’s good to take on an
occasional challenge. And to return
that favor by challenging others,
don’t you think? Anyway, I would
say to you please have a look if you
might. What you see (read) is who I