Appropriate Contempt,
Familiarity Requires
a Set of Perceived
Remembrances
This is an untrue statement. The need is
more for a held belief that memory has some
how been accrued, and that whatever of that
the mechanisms that brought about this accrual
were acting properly when hauling them in,
and that whatever storage mechanism(s) in
which they currently and might have in some
past existed have been consistently working
properly. So, the circumstances surrounding
the haul made for as close to flawless repre
sentations of what and when the particular
nugget of recording transpired, and at no
point since has this recording been altered
in any way. Is it any wonder, then, that any
perceived memory is fraught by its very
existence; that it might, in totality, be a
filmic or graphical or sensory construct
in its totatlity? Representing nothing?
Or representing what, exactly?
