The narrative floated
back and forth in time.
Sometimes things got
so mixed up that sep
arate events would
get jumbled together
as if they had literally
happened that way.
But did they? I
got to where I
couldn’t ascertain.
We liked to discuss
how this aspect of
the biopic emphasized
those layers of
complexity, and that
they give the audience
a sense of never
quite being aware
of exactly where
they were and what
was taking place.
Which pieces of this
somewhat off-kilter
puzzle transpired
in physical reality
and which were
merely small
conversations
or reactions
back and forth in time.
Sometimes things got
so mixed up that sep
arate events would
get jumbled together
as if they had literally
happened that way.
But did they? I
got to where I
couldn’t ascertain.
We liked to discuss
how this aspect of
the biopic emphasized
those layers of
complexity, and that
they give the audience
a sense of never
quite being aware
of exactly where
they were and what
was taking place.
Which pieces of this
somewhat off-kilter
puzzle transpired
in physical reality
and which were
merely small
conversations
or reactions
that took place
wholly within
the imagination
of the biographical
subject; what might
have simply been
hallucinatory?
wholly within
the imagination
of the biographical
subject; what might
have simply been
hallucinatory?
Or could the story,
in being depicted
utilizing a combination
of “real” and “unreal”
in being depicted
utilizing a combination
of “real” and “unreal”
pieces, simply be an
overarching metaphor
or juxtaposition through
which the audience
might in some real way
experience the years
of dementia through which
most of the central character’s
life so frantically, so tragically spun.
overarching metaphor
or juxtaposition through
which the audience
might in some real way
experience the years
of dementia through which
most of the central character’s
life so frantically, so tragically spun.